Search for: "Grynberg v. Roberts"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm
Grynberg: Fewer cases involve that tension. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Robert Burrell: heritage brand cases in Australia, some of which produce really undesirable results. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Registration v. acquisition is also a big deal. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
Robert Burrell: The market should often correct itself in terms of mark choice. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Robert Jacob: Doubts about so-called experts. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Subject v. object: is TM law descriptive or normative? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Session 3: The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:12 am
If Amazon v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
Thinks about this as a tension that needs balance: pro-TM protection policies v. preserving robust competition in product market and preserving patent/©’s public domain, as well as 1A issues. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Robert Burrell: Difficulties we have with nonuse. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
Surveys, testimony, observing online behavior are all different sources of empirical evidence: searches originating on Amazon v. searches originating on Google. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Primary Discussant: Robert Burrell Why are IP lawyers obsessed with boundaries? [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
Hosted by Graeme Dinwoodie (DePaul/Oxford) & Mark Janis (Indiana) Session 1: Permissible Uses of Marks: Rationales and Sources of Law. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
With respect to Beebe’s point about how well the system works for an unfamiliar judge: University of Alabama Board of Trustees v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Earliest surveys—1921 Coca-Cola v. [read post]
