Search for: "Guess? Retail Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2014, 10:07 pm
The winner Guess which approach works better? [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:10 am
In re InterDesign, Inc., Serial No. 77906060 (August 13, 2012) [not precedential].The Board found the the genus of goods at issue to be adequately defined by Applicant’s identification of goods. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:36 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:55 am
Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc., — Cal. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 3:37 am
[I guess I should go ask Alice.] [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:13 am
In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. dba Drew Estate, Serial No. 78979742 (December 31, 2009) [not precedential].The Board began by finding that the genus of goods is "cigars" and it ruled that the relevant public includes not only cigar "aficianodos" but also "ordinary members of the general public. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 9:12 am
Applicant caters to wholesale buyers, namely retailers, and not to retail consumers. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
By Eric Goldman Scooter Store, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:36 pm
In the retail industry same store sales is what Wall Street looks at to gauge how well as retailer is doing. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 3:26 am
In re Vitamin Shoppe Procurement Services, Inc., Serial Nos. 86905555, 86905614, 86905620, 86905628 (October 4, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Deputy Chief Judge Mark A. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:46 am
At least 110 million consumers were affected by the hack involving Target and Neiman Marcus retailers. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 3:08 am
Here, since military personnel are housed in tents, and third-party retailers tout the quality of these products used by NATO forces, the applicant's tents are the type of goods that consumer would associate with the military. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
Honestly, I felt fierce (although I guess I could have confused that feeling with menopause). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 2:25 am
" Weeks Dye Works, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:45 am
" In re Apple Inc., Serial No. 86857587 (January 13, 2020) [not precedential] (Opinion by Mark Lebow). [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
The decision in Unfiltered Brewing Inc. vs. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
Utilization review is not second guessing or just the opinion of a nurse. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:34 pm
Verizon Commc’ns, Inc., 627 F.3d 395, 399 (9th Cir. 2010). [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 3:47 pm
My guess is that this may not be the last we see of these glass cones. [read post]
