Search for: "Gummow v. Gummow" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2009, 11:06 pm
Justices Gummow and Kiefel of the High Court have rejected the wife's application for spedical leave to appeal the decision of the Full Court of the Family Court in Gomes v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm by war
Gummow J at one point stated, you need a database directive. [read post]
31 May 2009, 12:19 pm
A 5 member of the High Court (French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Kiefel JJ) in LK v Director-General DOCS has unanimously upheld the mother's appeal from the the Full Court of the Family Court, which in turn upheld the decision of the trial judge, Kay J, for the mother to cause the children to return to Israel. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 6:06 pm by war
Although unanimous, there are 2 judgments: as in iceTV, French CJ, Crennan and Kiefel JJ in one and Gummow and Hayne JJ in the second. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:31 pm
Yesterday the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in Ice TV Pty Ltd v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd, bringing to an end legal proceedings that have been going on for the past three years. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 3:27 am
During the course of the application, Gummow J noted: GUMMOW J: Yes, but what is the rationale for saying that? [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:37 pm by Barry Eagar
& J.Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited [ 2010 ] HCA 15Venue: High Court of AustraliaJudges: French CJ, Gummow JJ, Heydon JJ, Crennan JJ and Bell JJConcepts"Use of a trade mark""Authorised use""In the course of trade"Main Issue Did the circumstances fall short of constituting "use" within the meaning of the Trade Marks Act because neither the registered owner nor an authorised user engaged in any act or conduct known by… [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:35 pm
Gummow, Hayne and Heydon JJ delivered a second joint opinion. [read post]
4 May 2009, 6:47 pm
  There are some clues to the possible thinking of at least some judges, however, in the transcript of the applicant’s original special leave application before Gummow, Heydon and Kiefel JJ. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm by war
See Cadbury Scwheppes v Darrell Lea at [49] – [57]. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:15 am by war
Playcorp v bodum [54] to [62]). [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 7:35 am by Samuel Bray
(Some leads for readers: The leading source on equitable compensation is Meagher, Gummow, and Lehane's treatise on equity. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:14 am
Therefore,  the Full Federal Court’s decision in  Milwell v Olympic  would appear to have been wrongly decided. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 12:50 am by INFORRM
On 4 August 2010 the High Court of Australia gave judgment in the libel case of Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation [2010] HCA 25. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:33 pm by war
Apple Inc & Anor v Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
This submission relied on the dissent of McHugh J in Bashford v Information Australia (Newsletters) Pty Ltd. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:25 pm by war
The first thing to note is we’ve got those 2 teams giving separate judgments again: (French CJ, Crennan and Kiefel JJ; Gummow and Hayne JJ). [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am by Neil Wilkof
Reference was made to various cases, including Morison v Moat (1861) 68 ER 492, where Turner VC held that “the Court fastens the obligation on the conscience of the party, and enforces it against him”, and Smith Kline & French Laboratories v Secretary, Department of Community Services and Health (1990) 17 IPR 545, where Gummow J stated that “an obligation of conscience is to respect the confidence, not merely to refrain from causing detriment to the… [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:26 am by Stephen Page
John Alexander's company appealed to the High Court.The High Court in an unanimous judgment of Chief Justice French and Justices Gummow, Hayne, Heydon and Kiefel upheld the appeal. [read post]