Search for: "Gursky v. Gursky" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2008, 4:57 pm
One of the points-of-contention on the New York Court of appeals opinion in Ederer v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Partnership Law § 26(b) . . . immunizes from individual liability any partner in a partnership registered as a limited liability partnership who did not commit the underlying wrongful act, except to the extent that Partnership Law § 26(c) imposes liability on that partner where he or she directly supervised the person who committed the wrongful act” (Salazar v Sacco & Fillas, LLP, 114 AD3d 745, 747; see Ederer v Gursky, 9 NY3d 514, 523). [read post]
3 May 2011, 8:39 pm by Peter Vodola
  Nowhere did the court address more recent authority from the Connecticut Supreme Court on public policy that may be relevant to such considerations - authority that might include Gurski v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 3:30 am
Partner Limited Liability Shield:  Ederer v. [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
Gursky, Lawyer A joined and became a 30% shareholder along with Lawyer B (who then held 70%) of a small law firm organized as a professional corporation (PC). [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:29 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Once complete, “the plaintiff gets an order directing payment of the sum of money found due” (Ederer v Gursky, 881 NE 2d 204 [2007]). [read post]