Search for: "Gus Hurwitz"
Results 101 - 120
of 152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2020, 2:15 pm
In the news, Nick Weaver, Gus Hurwitz, and I take a quick pass at the Internet content regulation problem and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:37 pm
I ask Gus Hurwitz whether those laws are actually protected by the Constitution, and the answer turns out to be highly qualified. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 10:39 am
Gus Hurwitz reprises how much – or little – we know about the FTC and Facebook. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 5:47 pm
In the News Roundup, Gus Hurwitz covers the Supreme Court's ruling on when a forum is subject to First Amendment limits. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:38 pm
Jamil, joined by Gus Hurwitz, thinks this is heavy handed government penalization of a few unpopular companies and completely unmoored from any harm to consumers. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:03 pm
Gus Hurwitz talks to us about the seamy side of content moderation (or at least one seamy side) – the fight against "coordinated inauthentic behaviour. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 8:34 am
Submissions and questions should be sent to both Gus Hurwitz (ghurwitz@laweconcenter.org) and Keith Fierro Benson (kfierro@laweconcenter.org). [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 3:58 am
Justin (Gus) Hurwitz tells us that the big bipartisan compromise on privacy is probably dead for this Congress, killed by Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and the new politics of abortion. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:36 pm
But before we get to that that debate, Gus Hurwitz and I unpack the law and tactics behind Facebook's decision to pay $550 million to settle a facial recognition class action. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 10:49 am
Stewart Baker shared an episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast in which he sits down with Dave Aitel, Scott Shapiro and Gus Hurwitz to talk about the use of cyberattacks in the Ukraine war, Elon Musk’s attempt to take over Twitter and more. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:48 pm
Gus Hurwitz and I have doubts about the claims of illegality, but I reprise my frequent critique of privacy laws: they are uniquely likely to be enforced against those who annoy governing elites (because they're so vague and disconnected from objectionable conduct that they can be enforced against almost anyone). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:45 pm
Gus Hurwitz and I have doubts about the claims of illegality, but I reprise my frequent critique of privacy laws: They are uniquely likely to be enforced against those who annoy governing elites (because they’re so vague and disconnected from objectionable conduct that they can be enforced against almost anyone). [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 3:12 pm
” On the Cyberlaw Podcast, Stewart Baker interviewed FTC Commissioner Noah Phillips, Gus Hurwitz explained the cyber implications in the NDAA, and Matthew Heiman examined a circuit court split on insurance coverage of cyber-related losses. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 12:16 pm
Just as Gus Hurwitz and I noted of the FTC’s unfair methods of competition (UMC) policy statement in an ICLE issue brief, the numerous citations to the case law skew old–quite a bit old. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
In an article in the Brooklyn Law Review, Nebraska College of Law’s Justin (Gus) Hurwitz explains that the TCPA bans robocalls without the “prior express consent” of the receiver. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 8:35 am
Gus Hurwitz looks at the FTC's last-ditch appeal to stop the Microsoft-Activision merger. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:50 pm
Gus Hurwitz draws the short straw and sums up the second installment of the Elon Musk v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 9:16 am
ToTM posts by Dirk Auer, Alden Abbott, Gus Hurwitz, Gus again, and I enjoyed no monopoly on skepticism. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 5:12 pm
Gus Hurwitz brings us up to date on a host of European cyberlaw developments, from terror takedowns (Reuters, Tech Crunch) to competition law to the rise of a disturbingly unaccountable and self-confident judiciary. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:04 pm
" In other news, Gus Hurwitz breaks down a recent Ninth Circuit decision construing the Section 230 immunity that Congress has given to companies that filter content on the Internet. [read post]
