Search for: "H&R Block, Inc. v. Block, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2014, 7:29 am by Joy Waltemath
The DOL’s six criteria for determining whether individuals are “trainees” or “employees” supported its conclusion, the appeals court noted (Petroski v H&R Block Enterprises, LLC, May 2, 2014, Wollman, R). [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-11-30: Google Scholar link to AUTHORS GUILD, INC. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In the recent case (Majchrzak v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Hulu) http://t.co/FcBypcfwL1 -> US 1st Circuit affirms statutory damage award in Sony BMG v Tenenbaum http://t.co/ssyPB54Q82 -> Search of computer reasonable R. v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
H/T The Trademark Blog H&R Block Eastern Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm by grosin
H & R Block, Inc., 355 Md. 488, 735 A.2d 1039 (1999). in Green, taxpayers who had used H & R Block tax preparation services, and who also taken out “Refund Anticipation Loans” arranged by H & R Block, sued H & R Block for breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Similarly, WebMd, H&R Block and NeoStem settled cases filed against them by agreeing to additional disclosures requested by the plaintiff. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Similarly, WebMd, H&R Block and NeoStem settled cases filed against them by agreeing to additional disclosures requested by the plaintiff. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
Similarly, WebMd, H&R Block and NeoStem settled cases filed against them by agreeing to additional disclosures requested by the plaintiff.   [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Similarly, WebMd, H&R Block and NeoStem settled cases filed against them by agreeing to additional disclosures requested by the plaintiff. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:28 am by Ronald F. Wick
H & R Block, Inc., the complaint—originally filed 19 years ago—claims that Block, which loans customers the amount of their anticipated tax refund through a short-term bank loan, deliberately confused customers about the nature of the loan. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:15 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Walker, 2012 IL App (4th) 110215, the Appellate Court reversed a judgment entered following a temporary restraining order proceeding where an H&R Block franchisee tried to enforce a covenant against a tax preparer. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am by Howard Knopf
The relevant factors to be considered include:a. the quality and quantity of the material taken;b. the extent to which the respondent’s use adversely affects the applicant’s activities and diminishes the value of the applicant’s copyright;c. whether the material taken is the proper subject-matter of a copyright;d. whether the respondent intentionally appropriated the applicant’s work to save time and effort; ande. whether the material taken is used in the same or a similar… [read post]