Search for: "HA Friend and Company v. Friend and Company"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,811
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2011, 2:48 am
Westbrook Dolphin Square Ltd v Friends Provident Life and Pensions Ltd [2011] EWHC 2302 (Ch)This is probably one of the most factually complicated collective enfranchisement cases imaginable. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 2:48 am
Westbrook Dolphin Square Ltd v Friends Provident Life and Pensions Ltd [2011] EWHC 2302 (Ch)This is probably one of the most factually complicated collective enfranchisement cases imaginable. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 1:44 pm
At first glance, Coventry Health Care v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:46 pm
In Beye v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
In Serra v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:52 pm
The Delhi High Court delivered a salient ruling earlier this month in Phonographic Performance Limited v Hotel Gold Regency and others (MANU/DE/0942/2008), on which Mustafa says:"In a landmark decision, Phonographic Performance Limited v Hotel Gold Regency and others, the Delhi High Court held that copyright societies such as PPL, representing the interest of the music companies, cannot initiate copyright infringement actions to protect the interest of their members… [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 3:20 pm
In your will, or in a trust agreement, you can appoint family members, friends or professional trustees. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 7:21 am
Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
Bribery has real consequences”. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:18 pm
The ACLU submitted a friend-of-the-court brief arguing that class actions are appropriate when employees allege that a company's policy allowing managers to subjectively decide who receives promotions and pay increases has led to gender disparities, even in a company as large as Wal-Mart. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
The leading case in Tennessee on depreciation is: Senter v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 7:47 pm
Here is the heart of the matter according to a recent court decision out of Florida: In the recent case of Capital One Bank USA, NA v Gregorich, one court in Florida has hit the nail on the head by saying that the statute of limitations is governed by the Cardmember Agreement between the consumer and the credit card company. [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:58 am
[B]y posting advertisements for [the company defendant's] products on his personal Facebook profile after friending Nebraska residents, [the owner defendant] has purposefully directed activities toward Nebraska. . . . [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:49 am
In the case, Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:49 pm
In the case, Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:49 am
In the case, Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:49 am
In the case, Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 2:49 pm
In the case, Wyeth v. [read post]
