Search for: "HANNON v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2008, 6:54 pm
Hannon (Notre Dame Law School) has posted Judicial Federalism and the Anti-Suit Injunction: Using the Constitution to Correct the Supreme Court's Error in Donovan v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm by NL
There is now a third case on Occupiers Liability Act 1957 with our note to come shortly.Patrick Joseph Hannon v Hillingdon Homes Limited [2012] EWHC 1437 (QB)Mr Hannon was a heating engineer, carrying out work at a house owned by Hillingdon Homes. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm by NL
There is now a third case on Occupiers Liability Act 1957 with our note to come shortly.Patrick Joseph Hannon v Hillingdon Homes Limited [2012] EWHC 1437 (QB)Mr Hannon was a heating engineer, carrying out work at a house owned by Hillingdon Homes. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 3:31 am by tracey
High Court (Administrative Court) MK & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2012] EWHC 1896 (Admin) (10 July 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Wood & Anor v Mistry [2012] EWHC 1899 (Ch) (10 July 2012) BXL Services, Re [2012] EWHC 1877 (Ch) (10 July 2012)   JSC BTA Bank v Solodchenko & Ors [2012] EWHC 1891 (Ch) (10 July 2012)   Stevens v Hamed [2012] EWHC 1871 (Ch) (6 July 2012) High Court (Queen’s… [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:49 pm
No. 15), the Court announced they changed the test to conform with the 2006 United States Supreme Court case Brigham City v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 9:17 pm
Category: Civil Procedure   By: Christian Hannon, Contributor  TitleTaylor v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 2:20 am
Category: Injunctions  By: Christian Hannon, Contributor TitleEnergy Recovery, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 2:46 pm by Giles Peaker
In both cases, the claimants argued that Hannon v Hillingdon Homes [2012] EWHC 1437 QB (our note) meant that the absence of a bannister was a relevant defect for the purposes of s.4(3) DPA and thus s.4(1) was in play. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:38 pm
Category: Administrative Law     By: Christian Hannon, Contributor TitlePresident & Fellows of Harvard v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:37 pm
Category: Civil Procedure   By: Christian Hannon, Contributor    TitleK-Tech Telecommunications, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
This is an issue which has been disputed between claimants and the media since the decision in Hannon v. [read post]