Search for: "HARPER v. LORD"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm
" The issue for the Supreme Court in Harper v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:14 am
Avizandum : Court of Session judge Lord Woolman to rule on Scotland’s longest running civil damages claim. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
While in most cases it will be a media defendant who wishes to rely on the defence, there is Privy Council authority to the effect that the privilege can be asserted by a non-media defendant (Seaga v Harper [2008] UKPC 9). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:59 pm
I refer to the treatment of that decision by Lord Oliver of Aylmerton in A.G. v Guardian [1987] 1 WLR 1248 at 1319 D-E, referred to by Bingham LJ in the Court of Appeal in A.G. v Guardian Newspapers (No. 2) [1990] 1 AC 109 at 217C. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 6:21 am
QCs are appointed by the Queen on the advice of the Lord Chancellor, following consideration by the independent Queen’s Counsel Selection Panel. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
Windsor in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:20 am
Following the House of Lords case of Rhys-Harper v Relaxion Group plc in 2003 and amendments to the discrimination legislation made that same year, ex-employees were protected against victimisation by their former employer. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/l2MXeuR5q1 -> Newbury v Sun Microsystems Ltd – when is a settlement offer binding? [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:19 am
.; Harper, C. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ,… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:06 am
’” In one of the earliest law review articles on fair use, Judge Yankwich concludes: [T]he earnest scholar and student, be he reviewer, critic or scientist in the same field, should have reasonable access to the work of others, lest we put—in the words of Lord Ellenborough—“manacles upon science. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm
Here’s the judgment of the FCA: York University v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
Jack Straw, Lord Wakeham, Alastair Campbell and Sir Harold Evans were among the witnesses during the Inquiry’s 19th week, as Natalie Peck summarised here. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
Lord Patten discussed his case against Harper Collins after it abandoned publication of his book; the Sun’s Gary O’Shea and Stephen Waring answered questions on the paper’s coverage of Chris Jefferies’ arrest; and Bob Crow accused private investigator Steve Whittamore of “blagging” confidential information from the DVLA. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:43 am
In the Courts In the case of R (on the application of Harper) v Aldershot Magistrates Court [2010] EWHC 1319 (Admin) two senior police officers facing trial on criminal charges failed in an attempt to overturn a decision to make their addresses public. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
An extract explaining the project’s origin appeared in Harper’s Magazine here. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
See also Lord Lester’s Bill, clause 12. (2) Rule out some claimants? [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
” 18 months later Lord Phillips, giving the judgment of the whole Court of Appeal in Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd, said the opposite: “Thus copyright is antithetical to freedom of expression. [read post]
