Search for: "HARRIS, Alias WILLIAMS v. State" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Williams v Kublick 2007 NY Slip Op 04932 Decided on June 8, 2007 Appellate Division, Fourth Department . [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 1:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Williams v Kublick 2007 NY Slip Op 04932  Appellate Division, Fourth Department . [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 4:27 am
Williams v Kublick 2007 NY Slip Op 04932 Decided on June 8, 2007 Appellate Division, Fourth Department . [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
Article 23 of the draft NIS Directive states that “Member States shall ensure that the TLD registries and the entities providing domain name registration services for the TLD publish, without undue delay after the registration of a domain name, domain registration data which are not personal data. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Harris, University of California, Davis, School of Law Stephen Lee, University of California, Irvine School of Law Guadalupe T. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:31 am
Now, this weblog has reported one dispute of a distinctly tasteful nature since taste lay at the very heart of it -- Bailey and Williams v Graham and Levi Roots' Reggae Reggae Foods Ltd and another, the celebrated Reggae Reggae sauce case, the facts and outcome of which were lovingly garnished by Cat the Kat here and here). [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Williams, No. 07-1354 The interstate transport of a minor for prostitution in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2423(a) constitutes a crime of violence for purposes of the career offender provision of the Sentencing Guidelines. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Bartee, No. 07-1526 Denial of habeas corpus relief from a conviction for, inter alia, armed assault with intent to kill is affirmed where, regardless of whether petitioner defaulted on claims due to Massachusetts contemporaneous objection rule or whether the state ruling was contrary to or constituted an unreasonable application of federal law, he was unable to show the indispensable habeas requirement of "prejudice" under Brecht v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]