Search for: "HARRIS v. DAVIS"
Results 161 - 180
of 496
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
That case—G.G. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
One interesting case to be argued in a couple of months, Elonis v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
However, last week The Guardian reported that Judge Davis had sanctioned the news company for withholding records from the claimants until the eve of the trial. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:27 am
Birnbaum, Jina Choi, and Haimavatha V. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:27 am
Birnbaum, Jina Choi, and Haimavatha V. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 1:31 pm
" Nieves v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 1:54 am
Sep 27, 2007) (NO. 1570)Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, New York (Matthew M. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Davis, Keesha Davis, Matthew T. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:55 am
Davis & Gilbert, LLP, 126 AD3d 656, 656 (1st Dep’t 2015); Stackpole v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
Harris Associates L. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:37 am
16-0854Case Style: HIAWATHA HENRY, ADDIE HARRIS, MONTRAY NORRIS, AND ROOSEVELT COLEMAN, JR., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND FOR ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis discusses standing and United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 4:16 am
(See Davis v Cohen & Gresser LLP, 160 AD3d 484 [l51 Dept2018] [plaintiff bears burden of showing that statute of limitations has been tolled or does not apply]). [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 5:57 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
This opinion goes a very long way toward cutting back the expansive definition of "testimonial" statements - and therefore the range of evidence excluded by the Confrontation Clause - that had been stated in Davis v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:25 am
Admiral Harry Harris’s assertion last week that the United States would “clearly defend [the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands] if they are attacked by China. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
