Search for: "HART v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT"
Results 41 - 60
of 174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
Some state courts also have this power, but federal courts in the United States do not. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 5:30 am
The disputed technology involved intrusion detection systems that Advantor originally sold certain United States Air Force bases. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 11:17 am
Hart In California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:43 am
This opinion’s analysis is quite similar to the Hart v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:19 pm
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Defendant Failed to Meet Four-Part Test for Release Pending Appeal Pursuant to 18 USC §3143(b) United States v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 2:00 am
United Health Programs of America, Inc. and Cost Containment Group Inc., brought an action in the Southern District of New York, alleging that defendants terminated a group of former employees after they refused to engage in religious practices mandated by the “Onionhead” belief system. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm
United States http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1259.pdf (23 January 2012) This judgment has been hailed by commentators as one of the most significant Fourth Amendment decisions of the decade. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
The choice of law in these disputes, as Henry Hart would say, is inherently federal. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
The same malapportionment problem existed in congressional districts in states across the country.Writing in 1946 for the Court in Colegrove v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:15 pm
On January 3, 2020, Axon Enterprises Inc. filed a complaint against the Federal Trade Commission in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona challenging the constitutionality of the FTC’s administrative process. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:25 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice
Quid Pro Quo Requirement Clarified in Upholding Former Mayor's Conviction for Corruption
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 11:35 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:27 am
Defendant’s Response to United States’ Opposition to Motion to Suppress Evidence, U.S. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
”The district court dismissed Arellano’s cause of action.IIState law can be preempted in three circumstances pursuant to the Supremacy Clause, U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
”The district court dismissed Arellano’s cause of action.IIState law can be preempted in three circumstances pursuant to the Supremacy Clause, U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 1:30 pm
In holding section 21166 (and not section 21151) applied, the appellate court quoted from Moss v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
While the former course is undoubtedly preferable, past events in the United States and beyond make it crystal clear that both are possible. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
The state and the Park District jointly prepared the Eastshore State Park General Plan. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 10:12 pm
" United States v. [read post]
