Search for: "HART v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT"
Results 81 - 100
of 174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2011, 8:42 am
Puricelli identified the court as “THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTER [sic] DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 4:22 pm
Duffy in The Legal Intelligencer United States District Court Judge William Ditter, Jr. spent 3 pages describing the errors made in a post trial pleading by Puricelli in McKenna v City of Philadelphia which included mispellings such as "plaintf", "mocong papers" , "attoreys, "Ubited States" and all sorts of other mistakes. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 11:13 am
The District Court denied the SLAPP motion, and EA appealed. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 7:04 am
She catalogs the justice’s occasional victories, like United States v. [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
United States Issue: Whether the Federal Sentencing Guidelines are binding when a district court imposes a new sentence pursuant to a revised guideline range under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:45 am
July 31, 2013) Short version: replay of Hart v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In March 1994, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down one of the most important decisions in modern copyright history: Campbell v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
The Supreme Court "is competent to entertain all causes of action unless its jurisdiction has been specifically proscribed" (Thrasher v United States Liab. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm
District court: Pre-restraint claims are barred by Heck v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Hart Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann’s 2013 Mid-Year Environmental update. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 4:51 pm
Introduction This is Part III in a series of posts on the relationship between the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 7:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
R (on the application of AM) v Secretary of State for [read post]
30 May 2008, 7:25 am
Many conservatives believe the Rehnquist Court correctly interpreted the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
—the largest provider of voting equipment systems in the United States—has agreed to settle an antitrust complaint filed by the U.S. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Petitioners’ reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:49 pm
Precisely because Brown has become the crown jewel of the United States Reports, every constitutional theory must claim Brown for itself. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 4:16 pm
Hart In Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
We explain these procedures below but first offer a brief explanation of how the war powers provisions of the NSRAA would regulate the United States’ engagement in hostilities abroad. [read post]
