Search for: "HARVEY LEE GRANT v. THE STATE" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Amicus brief of America’s Health Insurance Plans Amicus brief of Landmark Legal Foundation Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Amicus brief of Family Research Council   Harvey v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
On defendants motion, the district court dismissed plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger, Harvey R. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger, Harvey R. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
Family Voices Coordinators participate in several groups within the state, including Title V/CSHCN, DD Council, Part C agency, CHIP board and parent and child advocacy organizations. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am by Kevin
 The End Times are drawing near, the X-ists are about to land, the False Prophets will kiss their dinosaurian asses and this planet will be sold down the river as sure as Lee Harvey Oswald's clone cashed the Conspiracy's checks [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am by Kevin
 The End Times are drawing near, the X-ists are about to land, the False Prophets will kiss their dinosaurian asses and this planet will be sold down the river as sure as Lee Harvey Oswald's clone cashed the Conspiracy's checks [read post]
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]