Search for: "HAWKINS v COX"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2014, 9:03 am
Cox. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:46 pm
Cox v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm
” Hawkins v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
See, e.g., Cox v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am
See, e.g., Cox v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Cox, 477 So. 2d 963 (Ala. 1985), that failure by the plaintiff (as opposed to a prescribing physician) to read a drug label precluded any finding of causation:[N]othing in the nature of [defendant’s] inadequate warning prevented plaintiff from reading it. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
The Board, in agreeing with the judge that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) by terminating employee Christina Cox, found it unnecessary to pass on the judge's finding that the discharge also violated Section 8(a)(3), inasmuch as the additional finding would be cumulative and would not materially affect the remedy for the discharge. [read post]
