Search for: "HAWKINS v. TEXAS"
Results 41 - 60
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2018, 11:33 am
Hawkins, 690 Fed.Appx. 72 (3d Cir. 2017). [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:32 am
Hawkins, 2017 WL 2376568 (3rd Cir. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:39 am
Edwin Hawkins, RIP. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:17 am
V. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
" "A Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend a judgment `serve[s] the narrow purpose of allowing a party to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence.'" Merritt Hawkins & Assocs. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
" "A Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend a judgment `serve[s] the narrow purpose of allowing a party to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence.'" Merritt Hawkins & Assocs. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 12:39 pm
A visiting Texas district judge thinks so (as do two members of the Ninth).United States v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 5:06 pm
After pondering the challenges posed by the legalization of marijuana, a Rhode Island superior court held that Darlington Fabrics violated the state’s Hawkins-Slater Act by refusing to hire an intern because she held a medical marijuana card. [read post]
2 May 2017, 5:45 am
Hawkins, 2010 WL 3718546 (Tex. [read post]
2 May 2017, 5:45 am
Hawkins, 2010 WL 3718546 (Tex. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 12:00 pm
In September 2013, a five-man crew was operating a mobile well-servicing rig in Hawkins, Texas. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) Commentary: Kris McDaniel-Miccio Judgment: Ruthann Robson Chapter 26. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:55 pm
California Teachers Ass’n and Hawkins v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
Texas, 15-797. [read post]
31 May 2016, 5:46 am
Despite this language, the trial court and then the Dallas Court of Appeals applied California law and ruled the agreements unenforceable in Merritt, Hawkins & Associates, LLC v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am
Rounding out this week’s old business is Hawkins v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am
Hawkins v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 7:01 am
" Citing Collier v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:55 am
Mauro also covers the four-to-four affirmance in Hawkins v. [read post]
