Search for: "HAYS v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 530
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm by Béligh Elbalti
[…] Given this, and considering that the appealed decision overturned the exequatur decree of the judgment in question on the ground that the [Canadian] judgment, which recognized a judgment from the United States, was a “summary judgment” (hukm musta’jil) enforceable only in the rendering State, despite the broad wording of [the applicable provisions],[vii] which covers all judgments (kul al-ahkam) rendered in a foreign State without specifying… [read post]
26 May 2024, 7:49 pm by Béligh Elbalti
The Ruling   The BSC rejected the appeal by ruling as follows: “It stems from the text of the provisions of Articles 1, 2 and 7 of the [1995 GCC Convention on the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments] as ratified by Bahrain in [1996], and the established practice of this Court, that judgments of a GCC Member State rendered in civil, commercial, administrative matters as well as personal status matters that become final [in the State of origin] shall be enforced by the… [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
Austen Hays filed the claim in London’s High Court and said thousands of Grindr users in the United Kingdom may have been affected. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The right mounted court challenges with mixed results for decades, until this June when the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority ruled in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:20 am by Eugene Volokh
The article is here; the Introduction: As articulated by Justice Brandeis in Whitney v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 6:44 am by INFORRM
Hay v Cresswell [2023] EWHC 882 (KB).Tattoo artist William Hay took libel action against Nina Cresswell, a woman who published a blog and social media posts stating that he had violently sexually assaulted her 10 years earlier. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:53 pm
So after the two-year terms expired (in 2018), under the Court of Appeal's rule, there (1) wasn't anyone elected to these positions on the City Council, and (2) the old officeholders were automatically booted out.At one point, Justice Sanchez's opinion tries to make hay out of the fact that these three officeholders didn't run in 2020, saying "Mission Viejo did hold a municipal election in 2020 but Sachs, Bucknum, and Raths did not run for reelection. [read post]