Search for: "HCA-Information Technology " Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2010, 6:35 am
Rich Elmore at Healthcare Technology News reports on the Tiger Team on security and privacy recommendations regarding the handling of personally identifiable health information. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  The article discusses the landmark decision of the the High Court of Australia’s in Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick ([2002] HCA 56) The article argues that, whilst internet technologies have brought about a revolution in communications, their legal impact in the context of internet defamation has been more modest but nevertheless important. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:28 am by Eric
In considering whether conduct is misleading and deceptive, the conduct as a whole is to be considered 'in light of the relevant surrounding facts and circumstances' (Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 60). [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:57 am by Amber Walsh
Within healthcare, Tailwind focuses on information technology, medical devices, pharmaceuticals and services. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Silicon Valley’s Speech: Technology Giants and the Deregulatory First Amendment, 1 Journal of Free Speech Law 337 (2021), Alan Z. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 4:37 pm
She had no information about Mr. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia:  In the case of Google Inc v ACCC ([2013] HCA 1) the High Court of Australia held that Google was not liable for engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct as a result of the production of sponsored links. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
  Its investigation shows “that phone hacking and illegal information theft were not done on behalf of one “rogue” reporter or one newspaper. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
The Economics and Politics of Information and its Legal Protection in Cryptocurrencies, Joseph Lee, School of Law, University of [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:25 pm by war
The film companies also sent iiNet on a weekly basis AFACT notices which purported to set out information about subscriber’s accounts that were being used to communicate infringing copies. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
This was approved by Sullivan CJ in the Irish Supreme Court in Sinclair v Gogarty [1937] IR 377 (see also Gallagher v Tuohy (1924) 58 ILTR 134 (Murnaghan J); Connolly v Radio Telifís Eireann [1991] 2 IR 446 (Carroll J); Reynolds v Malocco [1999] 2 IR 203, [1999] 1 ILRM 289, [1998] IEHC 175 (11 December 1998) (Kelly J)); and it represents the law in Australia (Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill [2006] HCA 46 (28 September 2006)), Canada (Champagne v Collège… [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:32 am
An HCA spokesman has reportedly said that the company continues to deny the allegations and would defend them vigorously in court. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
They may be expressed as service of suit clauses… They may provide for arbitration… They may be standard form… They may be bespoke… They may be asymmetric… They may and often will be coupled with choice of law clauses… They may be multi-tiered, providing first for a process of mediation, whether informal or formal, or informal and then formal, before providing for arbitral or judicial dispute resolution… Dispute resolution clauses… [read post]