Search for: "HENLEY v. HENLEY" Results 41 - 60 of 154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
If so, we might have a situation where John Roberts, the Chief Justice, decides a case titled, John Doe v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:29 pm by Marissa Grunes
S for the Skilly they feed us again,* T for the Trucks that we look for in vain; U stands for Eunuchs we might as well be, V the vexation on tasting the tea. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 2:58 am
 The basic principle in passing off, and indeed in opposing trade mark registrations on the basis that use of the applied-for mark would constitute passing off, should be that of "crooks lose": this doesn't require OHIM Boards of Appeal to go trawling the internet for evidence of misuse of marks, but it does require them to pay attention to evidence that has been put before them, as the Master Cola case indicates.Stuart concluded with an account of the… [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Supreme Court finally ruled that many restrictions on lawyer advertising violated free speech, in Bates v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Luke http://t.co/y92PEnrp5b -> Aspen Forum panel explores international Internet regulations, territoriality issues http://t.co/OqPgXQyOEu -> Poland: Plagiarism, Supreme Court of Poland, V CSK 125/14, 23 January 2015 http://t.co/DqhzVPl7eW -> [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright History Shyam Balganesh University of Pennsylvania Law School The Questionable Origins of the Copyright Infringement Analysis  Jerome Frank’s infamous/canonical © infringement test from Arnstein v. [read post]