Search for: "HILL v. AC"
Results 1 - 20
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2024 The thirteen consistory court judgments circulated in April included: Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs Fonts Also included are: CDM Decisions and Safeguarding; Reports from the Independent Reviewer; Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 1:17 am
Hill Ch noted that it was implicit from Aston Cantlow v Wallbank [2004] 1 AC 546 that burying the dead is an act of a public authority for the purposes of s. 6(3)(b) Human Rights Act 1998, and it was therefore unlawful to do so in a way incompatible with Convention rights – and the Consistory Court was itself a public authority [9]. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
V Lions Farming, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
A Con Law Exam Featuring A Barter Ban, Discrimination Against an AroAce Couple, and Campaign Finance
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Roughly once every two months Fung hikes three miles over hills and fields to the nearby hamlet of Shelbyville. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
The natural and ordinary meaning Citing Lord Bridge in Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Master Bell emphasised that in order to determine the natural and ordinary meaning of the words of which a plaintiff complains, one must consider the context in which the words were used and the mode of publication [8]. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:50 am
The case is captioned Gambrill v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
In this judgment, Chancellor Hill stated: “[20]. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:38 am
Walgreens liability depositions taken by Mougey and Gaddy have played in every trial against Walgreens in federal and state court.New Mexico v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:34 am
Access Copyright and the SOCAN v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 10:31 am
One provision of the Accelerating Charitable Efforts (ACE) Act regarding private foundation distributions to donor advised funds may also be passed due to the Administration’s support. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 12:37 am
The defendants were convicted on a majority verdict of 10 to 2; their appeal went all the way to the House of Lords and was dismissed: Whitehouse v Lemon and Gay News Ltd [1979] AC 617. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm
Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
The appearance of a substantial defence in possession claims, and property guardians and possession.
6 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
In Westminster CC v Clarke (1992) 2 AC 288 (a hostel for the homeless), exclusive possession was found to be inconsistent with the purposes for which the Council provided the accommodation. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 3:46 pm
So when I first read the facts of this case, and saw that it was a lawsuit brought by someone in a tony Hollywood Hills residence against his neighbor for "private nuisance" claiming that the neighbor's AC pool pump were allegedly too loud, I thought: "Get real, dude. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 1:39 pm
The right to move an occupier from one room to another is inconsistent with exclusive possession (see Westminster City Council v Clarke (1992) 2 AC 288). [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 2:41 pm
Holloman v. [read post]
