Search for: "HILL v. USPS "
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
” While the Second Circuit noted in its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:18 pm
For starters, Hill alleges that contrary to the statutory requirement at FDC Act § 505(j)(2)(A)(v) that the labeling for a generic drug be “the same” as the labeling approved for the brand-name, reference listed drug relied on for approval, “the generic forms of fluocinolone acetonide that FDA has approved will almost certainly include labeling that is substantially different from the labeling used on Hill’s products. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
National/Federal DeJoy Maintains Financial Ties to Former Company as USPS Awards It New $120 Million Contract MSN – Jacob Bogage (Washington Post) | Published: 8/6/2021 The U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
Supreme Court’s controversial ruling in Husted v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm
On the same day Nicol J handed down judgment in the case of Notting Hill Genesis v Ali. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm
Approaching the limits of its federal credit line, the USPS must change drastically or go bust. [read post]
