Search for: "HOPKINS v. SETTLES" Results 1 - 20 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:54 am by David Pocklington
Hopkins Ch. considered consider the various elements of the Petition noting that she was also greatly influenced by the views of the various consultees, and the fact that although a number of them raised objections, those objections have almost all now been resolved [37]. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:54 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The opinion begins with reference to well-settled law that to constitute substantial evidence, a medical opinion must be based on reasonable medical probability ( McAllister v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:49 am by Emma Snell
The Biden administration has so far resisted Kenya’s request that the U.S. pick up the bill for the upgrade, but the issue isn’t settled. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
Dutch energy company, GasTerra, announced yesterday that Russian gas producer Gazprom was cutting off its gas supply after it refused to settle its contracts in rubles. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:51 pm by INFORRM
Vardy and Rooney were repeatedly encouraged to settle out of court, but neither side backed down. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:13 pm by Apsosredesign
” Early medical malpractice cases 1164: Everad v Hopkins: a case where a master and his servant received damages due to a physician practicing “unwholesome medicine,” resulting in the servant being made more ill. 1374: Stratton v Swanlond: Agnes of Stratton and her husband sued John Swanlond, a surgeon, for failing to treat and cure her mangled hand. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
This was a 6-1 decision with Wecht dissenting on procedural grounds.The Bristol decision reversed the law set forth in the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s previous ruling in the separate case of Hopkins v. [read post]