Search for: "HOUSE v. UNITED STATES" Results 141 - 160 of 13,790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2021, 8:45 am by Unknown
Blog posts:Sanctuary Policies, Immigration, and Public Safety (Border Criminologies Blog, Jan. 2021) [text] Through the Looking Glass, Darkly: The Supreme Court’s Muslim Travel Ban Decision (Just Security Blog, Jan. 2021) [text]US: Newly Released Files Show Fast-Track to Deportation (Human Rights Watch, Jan. 2020) [text]Reports:Brief of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees before the Supreme Court of the United States in the case Chad Wolf, Acting… [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:04 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
  A Federal Judge in the Eastern District of New York just wrote a 42-page opinion concerning collateral consequences that should be required reading for every trial judge (Federal and State) in the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:49 am
[hereinafter Reuters, Judge strikes down plea][2] Id.; See United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 2:30 pm by EEM
Leadership Forsaken: Six Months of the Trump Refugee Bans (Human Rights First, July 2017) [text]"A Veteran ICE Agent, Disillusioned with the Trump Era, Speaks Out," New Yorker, 24 July 2017 [text]"White House Domestic Advisers Take Lead on Refugee Decision: Officials," Reuters, 26 July 2017 [text]Related post:- Regional Focus: United States (22 July 2017)Tagged Publications. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:06 am by Immigration Prof
Official White House Photo On Friday, the Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh decided United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm by Franco Tarulli
, Inc. et al, 09 Div. 4373 (SAS), where a Magistrate Judge of the Southern District of the United States Federal Court found that Gucci’s communications with its in-house counsel were not privileged because his status with the relevant bar was inactive. [read post]
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]