Search for: "HUBBARD v. COATES"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2009, 7:46 pm
"Third, this case should demonstrate the comfort and skill with which the Supreme Court can evaluate dueling econometric analyses of market competitiveness, since the Coates & Hubbard paper and contradictory studies are central to the issues here. [read post]
28 May 2008, 12:46 pm
Coates IV and Columbia Business School Dean R. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:19 am
Here’s how Coates and Hubbard characterize the evidence: In sum, the market structure and performance of the mutual fund industry is consistent with strong competition among funds. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 2:08 pm
First, Wright suggests (as do Easterbrook and Coates & Hubbard) that a lack of sophistication on the part of certain mutual fund investors may not by itself imperil competitiveness because, in the words of Easterbrook quoting Schwartz & Wilde, "sophisticated investors who do shop create a competitive pressure that protects the rest. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
There is significant evidence of vigorous competition in the market for mutual funds, as discussed extensively by Coates & Hubbard and in the Jones amicus brief that I joined . [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 12:18 pm
To continue my series of posts on Jones v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 6:05 am
"But what about the Coates-Hubbard study that Easterbrook cited as evidence of how competitive the investment advisory industry is? [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:15 pm
FRANKLIN COATES and LORIE A. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
