Search for: "HUGHES v. HUGHES"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,070
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Supreme Court, and agreed that the FTC had made out a prima facie case under the burden-shifting framework commonly attributed to Baker Hughes. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 3:43 am
., v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 10:47 am
The court was not convinced that consumers would recognise the prefix 'MY' as referring to 'mycelium' and 'myco', a prefix meaning 'fungi'.Anastasiia Kyrylenko commented on the decision of AFNIC (the French country-code top-level domain name registrar) to transfer 'porcelainefrancaisedelimoges.fr' to the owners of the French geographical indication (GI) ‘Porcelaine de Limoges’, even though the domain name was registered before the… [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 12:33 pm
by Dennis Crouch In Roku, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:54 am
By this time the case was called Chevron v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 3:50 am
The recent decision of the Munich Local Division in SES v Hanshow seemed to go in an odd direction by using the application as filed and prosecution history in the claim interpretation.Rose Hughes also speculated on the potential referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal to consider how much the description should be taken into account for claim interpretation, given the confusing and contradictory case law on this important question. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 5:28 pm
by Dennis Crouch In 2022, the Federal Circuit issued a Judge Hughes decision in IBM v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:46 pm
by Dennis Crouch Pacific BioSciences v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
It is intriguing to read Hugh Logue of Outsell’s report that their latest research reveals significant and latent demand for legal information among non-legal professionals, presenting, it is suggested, a substantial opportunity for providers in the information sector. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
Judges Dyk and Hughes were also on the panel. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm
All too often, as in Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 12:04 pm
Louis Sirkin (Santen & Hughes). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:45 am
This year, the highlights series was produced in collaboration with IP practitioners and researchers: Clarisse Mideva, Rita Chindah, and Jessie Mgonga.Marcel Pemsel discussed the recent Advocate General's opinion in the case of EUIPO v Indo European Foods (Case C-801/21 P), which concerns the effects of Brexit on EU trade mark law after the end of the transition period. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
(Cohen, v. 2, p. 9.) [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:55 am
Zlotnick, surrounded by fans with open umbrellas couldn’t see Matsui or Phil Hughes, the Yankees’ pitcher. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 4:42 pm
BrazilGazeta do Povo v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 2:28 pm
Patents Rose Hughes discussed the interpretation of G2/21 by the Board of Appeal in the T 0116/18 case and the fact that this interpretation considers the rejection of the language of plausibility, the divergence between the EPO and the UK courts and what it requires with regards to the disclosure of a technical effect relied on for inventive step. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:47 pm
Lundbeck A/S v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:00 pm
[1] Dimou v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:08 am
–Emoji GmbH v. [read post]
