Search for: "HUGHES v. HUGHES"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,079
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2023, 5:58 am
Here’s a brief summary of what you missed from the IPKat.IP GenerallyKatfriend Alessandro Cerri provided an update on the intellectual property-related aspects of the European Commission's recent communication of its strategy on Web 4.0 and virtual worlds.PatentsRose Hughes gave us a two-part analysis of the Court of Appeal of England & Wales decision in Sandoz v BMS and how it diverged from the EPO's approach to plausibility.… [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
" (Hugh Hall Campbell, KC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm
No doubt they mean well and aren’t beholden to Access Copyright – but their opinions are so over the top and poorly informed that they have a very bad look:Kate Taylor, May 26, 2023 Hugh Stevens, July 15, 2023 Hugh Steven’s opinion piece conveniently follows up just two days later on the announcement by Access Copyright (“AC”) that it was downsizing and restructuring. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
Criteria to be applied In contrast to the Chamber, the Grand Chamber considered that the Axel Springer criteria for balancing Articles 8 and 10 (see Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227)) were not applicable. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 4:44 pm
The full judgement (Smith v Backhouse [2023] [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 8:56 am
Hughes Markets, Inc., supra, 36 Cal.App.4th at p. 1699; Reid v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 4:38 pm
The lawsuit, Randle v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
”Expert Statement Jared Holt (Resident Fellow, Digital Forensic Research Lab, Atlantic Council) Expert Statement Brian Hughes (Associate Director, Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab, American University)Expert Statement Aziz Huq (Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School) and Tom Ginsburg (Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School)“Statement on the January 6, 2021 Attacks and the Threat to American Democracy”Expert… [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:09 pm
See Hughes v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 4:44 am
Over at Balkinization, an interesting conversation is unfolding on the uses of history in Supreme Court decisionmaking, especially as pertains to the recent Haaland v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:13 am
Hughes: expression is by humans. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:48 am
Chair: Daphne Keller: EU heavy compliance obligations + a bunch of other laws coming into effect right as platforms are laying off people who know how to do that—a bumpy road. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:11 am
Humans v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
EU-Member state issues: need to ask new questions—is a regulation v a directive conclusive? [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:06 pm
Henry Yang followed up on his previous reporting on the Interdigital v Lenovo FRAND judgment of the High Court of England and Wales, and analysed in detail the first part (of three) of the judgement regarding comparable licenses and determination of a FRAND rate. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:38 am
The patents concerned are the same patent family that was successfully challenged before the US Supreme Court in Amgen v Sanofi, which you can read about here from Rose Hughes. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:26 am
The CIA did that when asked about the Hughes Glomar Explorer, a ship. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 11:45 am
Bradley Hester originally brought the case Hester v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm
Following the judgment there was confusion at the Patent Office.Rose Hughes (photo: Neil Graveney)Rose Hughes focused on plausibility. [read post]
