Search for: "HUGHES v. HUGHES"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,078
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
EU has been first mover on some things and not others (Art. 17 v notice and takedown). [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Avoids problems of regulatory arbitrage. 230 v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
SAS Inst. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:19 am
Hughes, 310 Ill.App. 371, 34 N.E.2d 566 (1st Dist.1941) (loss incurred by unemployed plaintiff who provided services in the home); Jerrell v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am
Heldman * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe * Video Excerpts Qualify as Fair Use (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Marcel Pemsel commented on the recent English High Court decision Interdigital v Lenovo, regarding FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory) licensing rates for patents. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
This so-called "Glomar response" is derived from a Cold War-era case, when the CIA refused to confirm or deny to the Los Angeles Times whether it had information about the USNS Hughes Glomar Explorer, a CIA ship that was used to try to salvage a sunken Soviet spy sub. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:33 pm
The success of Google’s appeal in Lloyd v Google and the decision in Warren v DSG Retail (see our post here) seems to have halted 2021’s flow of data breach claims. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 12:00 pm
Entitled “Combating Ransomware: One Year On,” the paper was drafted in consultation with leading experts in the field: V. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm
(The Fifth Circuit does reassign cases, for example, against Judge Hughes.) [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 3:06 pm
From Montaquila v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 12:16 am
On Tuesday morning during Oral Questions in the Commons, the Secretary of State for Justice said this in reply to a supplementary question from Martin Docherty-Hughes (West Dunbartonshire, SNP): “We have made it clear that we would not rule out ever withdrawing from the ECHR in the future”. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The critics and cheerleaders of Dr. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:39 pm
JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: I have to go back to the complaint more carefully, but at least my law clerk did and told me that there was no allegation, and so you might be right, that keeping two fiduciaries would have reduced the price and to what level, but—Hughes v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Funk v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 2:30 pm
(E.g., Humana Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:19 am
On appeal from [2022] NICA 15 These proceedings challenge the lawfulness of the Northern Ireland Protocol (“the Protocol”), which formed part of the agreement between the United Kingdom (“the UK”) and the European Union (“the EU”) regarding the UK’s exit from the EU. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:28 am
Aviva Investors Ground Rent GP Ltd and another v Williams and others [2023] UKSC 6. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
Denying injunctive relief may support the public interest, TD Bank v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm
In 2016, Leonard v. [read post]
