Search for: "HUNTER v. CALIFORNIA" Results 121 - 140 of 325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (458 U.S. 457, 1982) and Hunter v Erickson (393 U.S. 385, 1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Wednesday’s oral arguments in oral arguments in Zubik v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Note that voting restrictions may also be unconstitutional if they are motivated by a desire to discriminate based on race, see Hunter v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin
The only group that filed an argument opposing the repeal was the California State Sheriffs’ Assocation. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Hunter, Princeton University  Scott Kurashige, University of Michigan The year 2013 marks the anniversaries of two major events in the history of black freedom struggles—the March on Washington’s fiftieth and the Emancipation Proclamation’s sesquicentennial. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:52 am by Whitney Jones Roy and Angela Reid
  Specifically, the Court found that declining to hear Cal Chambers’ claim was appropriate because Cal Chambers appeared to be seeking to avoid an unfavorable decision in a state case (CERT v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:35 am
Click here for a more detailed summary.PD-1047-08, Jason Wayne Hunter v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am by Heidi Henson
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (1982) and Hunter v Erickson (1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:58 pm by Gordon Firemark
p=2278 Netflix Gets an Earful and Settles Suit with Deaf ViewersLawyers.com: http://blogs.lawyers.com/2012/10/netflix-gets-an-earful-and-settles-suit-with-deaf-viewers/Ruling on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings: http://dredf.org/captioning/MJP-DENIED-JUDGE-PONSOR-ORDER-6-19-12.pdf ‘Dog’ Chapman Scores Big Legal Victory Against ‘Bounty Hunter’ Producer THResq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/dog-chapman-scores-big-legal-387379 National Conference of… [read post]