Search for: "HUNTLEY v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2012, 3:53 pm
In People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:27 pm
Knorr v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 1:56 pm
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
When Police Conduct a Post Arrest Search Without an Arrest: Challenging Illegal Searches in New York
20 Jan 2012, 2:57 am
Ultimately, if you are searched in a legal manner or during their investigation you state that you have a gun, the case addressed here may not help your cause, but your attorney should still seek to challenge the police and preserve your rights through a Huntley or Mapp Hearing. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:42 am
” or perhaps “While we’re attacking frontally, watch Brinkley and Huntley describing contrapuntally the cities we have lost” or “everybody say his own kyrie eleison“. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
The Royal College of Nursing & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2010] EWHC 2761 (Admin) (10 November 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that a scheme which prohibits people convicted or cautioned for certain crimes from working with children or vulnerable adults breaches human rights law. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:33 pm
The Commonwealth Court rejected all challenges to the act applying the reasoning of the Pa Supreme Court in Huntley & Huntley, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:10 pm
DA 09-0570 92009-0570; 2010 MT 55) relied on Article V, Sec. 8 of Montana's Constitution, which states in relevant part: "[a legislator] shall not be questioned in any other place for any speech or debate in the legislature. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 4:00 pm
Therefore, in my view, this would unduly burden the defendant's federal and state constitutional rights, which prohibit the use of truly involuntarily obtained statements, by requiring the defendant to forfeit state statutory rights in order to protect constitutional ones. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:52 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Curtis v R [2010] EWCA Crim 123 (09 February 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) O’Beirne v Hudson [2010] EWCA Civ 52 (09 February 2010) Drew v Whitbread [2010] EWCA Civ 53 (09 February 2010) B, R (on the application of) v Cornwall Council & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 55 (09 February 2010) W (Children), Re [2010] EWCA Civ 57 (09 February 2010) Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences Inc [2010] EWCA Civ 33 (09… [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 3:00 pm
" Maryland v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:41 am
State Farm Insurance Co. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
Gear, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:57 am
Last Act: 04/27/09 REFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE & PENSIONSS4902
HUNTLEY -- Creates mental health incident review panels Same as A 6835 BLURB : Men Hyg. incident review panels Last Act: 04/27/09 REFERRED TO MENT [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 2:02 am
A2596
Markey (MS) -- Extends the statute of limitations in criminal and civil actions for certain sex offenses committed against a child less than eighteen years of age Same as S 2568 Last Act: 03/19/09 advanced to third reading cal.262A4110
Brodsky (MS) -- Requires disclosure of environmental conservation permit applicant's record of compliance with state, federal, and foreign environmental regulations No Same asLast Act: 03/19/09 advanced to… [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:49 am
TBTA dispute resltn Last Act: 03/17/09 REFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE & PENSIONSS3380
AUBERTINE -- Prohibits the retail sale, distribution or offer to sell at retail to any person in the state, novelty lighters Same as A 6875 BLURB : Gen Bus L. prhbt nvlty lghtr Last Act: 03/17/09 REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTIONLast Action Date: 03/18/09(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 3:14 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Tann v Herrington [2009] EWHC 445 (Ch) (10 March 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench) Huntley v Simmonds [2009] EWHC 406 (QB) (05 March 2009) Al Jedda v Secretary of State for Defence [2009] EWHC 397 (QB) (05 March 2009) Huntley v Simmonds [2009] EWHC 405 (QB) (13 February 2009) High Court (Family Division) K v K [2008] EWHC [...] [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
