Search for: "Hagan v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2010, 7:32 am
In the article, I explain that: In United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 10:02 am
However, Senator Hagan noted that 619(f) does not limit in any manner transactions and normal banking relationships with a fund not controlled by the banking entity or a fund sponsored by the banking entity.Section 619(d)(4)(I) permits certain banking entities to operate hedge and private equity funds outside of the United States provided that no ownership interest in any hedge or private equity fund is offered for sale or sold to a U.S. resident. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 8:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm
M/V CLARISSA, 2010 WL 1371642 (S.D. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
In addition, the authority of local and state regulatory agencies will be usurped by the U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:50 am
SEC v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
This understanding of Dirks was implicitly confirmed by the Supreme Court’s more recent decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:06 am
Flickr user objects to Independent newspaper’s unauthorised use of his photo (1709 Copyright Blog) (IP Whiteboard) Copyright woes of a game designer: Burrows v Smith (IP Osgoode) Neutralize UK file-sharing legal threats – Join TalkTalk (TorrentFreak) EWHC: No infringement; invalidity for lack of inventive step: Research in Motion Limited v Motorola (EPLAW) (IPKat) United States US Patents Claiming under the influence (of Bilski) (12:01 Tuesday)… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The title of the article is The Quiet Coup, and it's introductory paragraph changed my whole year… The crash has laid bare many unpleasant truths about the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
United States Postal Service, 2006 WL 2687019, *2 (D.D.C. 2006), aff'd No. 06-5321, 2007 U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:49 am
App., 2000); Hagan v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 8:55 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and McConnell v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 2:40 pm
" In United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 7:56 am
Although this view of insider trading can be justified by the policy objectives underlying the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 1:33 am
"
Hagan v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
United States, 484 U.S. 19 (1987), left unresolved by an equally divided Court. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
United States applied the classical theory, not the misappropriation theory; and United States v. [read post]
