Search for: "Hahn v Ali"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
To rectify this situation, and deal with all the issues unanticipated in 1965, the ALI in 1997 adopted what amounts to a book in and of itself: the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability.One place where the ALI was prescient in 1965 was in recognizing that some products had inherent risks that, no matter what, could not be designed away. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 7:18 am
Hahn v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Technically it’s a “biologic” – a product consisting of large-molecule derivatives from living tissue, rather than the small molecules used to formulate drugs.But then, the ALI wrote comment k in the early 1960s (§402A was adopted in 1965), and the concept of a "medical device" wasn't much developed. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
” Largely as a result of concerns over liability for scientifically undiscovered risks (something the Supreme Court never really had to address), in Hahn v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
This cause of action was recognized by the ALI in Restatement (Second) of Torts §46 (1965). [read post]
