Search for: "Haight v. Haight"
Results 101 - 120
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am
S.A.S. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
SAS Inst. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 6:06 am
However four years later, in Graham v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 8:40 am
” Helpfully, DEA is asking those who plan to attend the listening sessions to consider the following questions ahead of time: If telemedicine prescribing of schedule III-V medications were permitted in the absence of an in-person medical evaluation, what framework, including safeguards and data, with respect to telemedicine prescribing of schedule III-V medications do you recommend to help the agency ensure patient safety and prevent diversion of controlled substances? [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
Again, this is because: (1) Ketamine is FDA-approved as an anesthetic; (2) Drugs with one approved indication can be prescribed off-label for other indications; and (3) The Ryan Haight Act allowed for Schedules II-V controlled substances to be prescribed over telehealth, without a prior in-person examination. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am
In my humble opinion, the Law Professors Amicus Curiae brief filed on November 6, 2016, by Professor Christine Haight Farley of American University Washington College of Law and Professor Rebecca Tushnet of Georgetown University Law Center, make this and other points quite well. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Casto’s article Robert Jackson’s Critique of Trump v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm
TM clerk was very different from patent counterparts—technical expertise v. experts in delicate art of distinguishing and classifying signs and words. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am
Protection v. enforcement: even if protected as a TM, the scope may be limited. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
The dispute is reminiscent of Ellis v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 6:47 am
My response invoked Cincinnati v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:43 am
Brown v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:27 am
The employee’s FMLA claim and state law emotional distress claims also advanced (Willoughby v Connecticut Container Corp, November 27, 2013, Haight, C, Jr). [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 5:55 am
The employee’s other claims failed on various grounds (Haight v NYU Langone Medical Center, Inc, June 27, 2014, Schofield, L). [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Christine Haight Farley, American University Washington College of LawSleeping Treaty: The Pan-American Trademark ConventionTTAB’s 2000 Belmont case: British-American Tobacco v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:42 pm
American University Washington College of LawYouTube linkWelcome, Christine Haight Farley, American University Washington College of LawWe are in the midst of an historic expansion of internet domain names with more than 1200 new generic top-level domains (“gTLDs”) now competing with <.com>. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
