Search for: "Hair v. U.s.*" Results 1 - 20 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am by Roger Parloff
The charge in question is “corruptly obstructing an official proceeding” under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
In the administrative complaint, the CPSC alleges that the products, which include children’s sleepwear garments, carbon monoxide detectors, and hair dryers, constitute “substantial product hazards. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am by Eric Goldman
Given the risks of a FOSTA claim, this legal standard would create a potent notice-and-takedown scheme where web hosts will remove any alleged sex trafficking content without much scrutiny, and that hair-trigger response can be easily weaponized to remove legitimate content. [read post]