Search for: "Hairston v. United States"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2019, 9:58 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 7:41 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 6:37 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:22 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 5:16 pm
’ United States v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:43 pm
Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470, this court's response to the United States Supreme Court decision in Blakely v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
Finally the State asserts that because Graham deals with a single offense, the Hairston analysis applies. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:00 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 6:16 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:01 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:01 am
State v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
The United States appeals Joseph Hairston's 60- month sentence, which was re-imposed by the district court on remand in light of United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
The Sao Paulo location is the second overseas office for 700-lawyer Proskauer, which has seven offices in the United States and one in Paris. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Hairston, No. 05-5178 Sentence for drug and weapons charges is vacated and remanded where: 1) the district court violated Rule 11 by not informing defendant before accepting his guilty pleas that he faced a mandatory fifteen-year minimum sentence; 2) the error was not harmless; and 3) vacating all of defendants guilty pleas is the proper remedy. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:02 pm
See Hairston v.Danville & Western R. [read post]
