Search for: "Hale v. Brown"
Results 81 - 100
of 166
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
In Say v Smith (1563) Plowd 269, 272, Anthony Brown J said that “every contract sufficient to make a lease for years ought to have certainty in three limitations, viz in the commencement of the term, in the continuance of it, and in the end of it … and words in a lease, which don’t make this appear, are but babble.”25. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
In Say v Smith (1563) Plowd 269, 272, Anthony Brown J said that “every contract sufficient to make a lease for years ought to have certainty in three limitations, viz in the commencement of the term, in the continuance of it, and in the end of it … and words in a lease, which don’t make this appear, are but babble.”25. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
Starting on Monday 7 November is Rabone & Anor v Pennine Care NHS Trust, which is scheduled for 2-3 days to be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Walker, Brown, Mance and Dyson. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
On Friday 4 November the matter of Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor will be heard in Courtroom 2 by Lady Hale and Lords Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
This week the Supreme Court will hear Russell and others v Transocean International Resources Limited (Scotland) over two days commencing on Wednesday 26 October by Lords Hope, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
This week the Supreme Court will hear Russell and others v Transocean International Resources Limited (Scotland) over two days commencing on Wednesday 26 October by Lords Hope, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
’ It was unsurprising that a majority of Supreme Court followed the Court of Appeal’s lead and quashed the rule (as has become a common feature in Article 8 judgments, Lord Brown dissented). [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
It was unsurprising that a majority of Supreme Court followed the Court of Appeal’s lead and quashed the rule (as has become a common feature in Article 8 judgments, Lord Brown dissented). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
Lord Brown’s dissenting judgment is considered below. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:56 pm
Brown, 382 F. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
The view of Lady Hale in M v Slough 'has commanded general acceptance', citing: I remain of the view which I expressed in Wahid [2003] HLR 2, at para 32, that the natural and ordinary meaning of the words 'care and attention' in this context is 'looking after'. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
The view of Lady Hale in M v Slough 'has commanded general acceptance', citing: I remain of the view which I expressed in Wahid [2003] HLR 2, at para 32, that the natural and ordinary meaning of the words 'care and attention' in this context is 'looking after'. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
Lords Brown, Dyson, Walker and Kerr agreed. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
On Thursday 28 July 2011, Lord Phillips, Lady Hale and Lord Brown will hear an application for permission to appeal in the case Ministry of Defence v AB and others. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 2:51 am
Lord Mance, with whom Lady Hale agreed, and Lord Clarke give dissenting judgments. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
The Supreme Court will hear two appeals this week commencing with the two day hearing of R v Gnango on Monday 11 and Tuesday 12 July 2011 to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Judge, Kerr, Clarke, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
The starting point for the majority (Lords Phillips, Brown, Collins, Kerr and Dyson) was that every wrong should have a remedy, unless it was in the public interest to grant immunity: whilst the minority (Lord Hope and Lady Hale) were concerned of the chilling effect that abolishing immunity might have, and felt that such a fundamental rule change should be left to Parliament, the majority were undeterred by such considerations, pointing to the fact that since Hall… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:53 pm
Brown. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
First, Adamas Limited v Mrs Yong Ting Ping How Fok Cheung will be heard on Tuesday 28 June 2011 by Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Clarke. [read post]
