Search for: "Hale v. Collins"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm
heard 4 and 5 February 2020 (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, heard 29 and 30 January 2020 (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants, heard 6 and 7 November 2019 (Lady Hale and Lords Reed, Kerr, Hodge and Lloyd-Jones) Please let us know if there are other reserved judgments which… [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:02 am
Collins v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
Hale v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am
Moreover, Lord Carnwath advocated the rationale in the ILPA case where Collins J demonstrated “a clear understanding” of the practical consequences of invalidity. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 2:41 am
We have dealt with the basic facts in Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd [2014] UKSC 52 when considering its previous incarnations (Cooke v Mortgage Business [2012] EWCA Civ 17 and Re North East Property Buyers Ltd [2010] EWHC 2991 (Ch)). [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:04 am
However, the justices did discuss it, with a notable point arising in that Lord Collins and Lord Sumption agreed that the contract, as well as the conveyance and the mortgage, were all part of the same transaction, whilst Lady Hale, Lord Wilson and Lord Reed disagreed that the contract was part of the indivisible transaction. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses Jones v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:02 am
The issue for the bench (L Hale, L Wilson, L Sumption, L Reed, and L Collins) is whether a purchaser may create an equitable interest capable of binding third parties at the point of the contract of sale; and whether the principles set out in Abbey National B.S. v Cann [1991] AC 56 are applicable. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Mr Arden [QC for Camden] referred also to the decision of the House of Lords in Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] AC 301, relating to the definition of “a dwelling-house let as a separate dwelling” in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
Mr Arden [QC for Camden] referred also to the decision of the House of Lords in Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] AC 301, relating to the definition of “a dwelling-house let as a separate dwelling” in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am
Starting on Monday 21 May 2012 in the Privy Council is the appeal of ANS & anor v ML, listed for two days in front of a panel of five (L Hope, L Hale, L Wilson, L Reed, L Carnwath). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am
Lord [Sky]Walker and Lord Collins wrote the judgment of the court, with Lady Hale and Lord Phillips agreeing in full. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 7:51 am
Lord Collins observed that this was due to three factors: a) previous authorities concerned properties registered in the sole name of one party; b) their Lordships had not spoken with one voice in Stack particularly on the distinction, if there were one, between inferred and imputed intention; and c) Baroness Hale’s speech in Stack had been treated as though it were a statute and its… [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
Baroness Hale/Lord Walker are quite amusing about the foundational case, Gissing v Gissing [1971] AC 886 noting that “their Lordships speeches were singularly unresponsive to each other” (at [28]), but then the hard work begins. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
Lord Collins agreed with Lord Walker and Lady Hale, and added some reflections of his own. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
On Tuesday 1 November Lords Hale, Kerr and Wilson will hear Joseph Lennox Holmes v Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 12:18 pm
On 27 July, amidst the traditional flurry of judgments handed down at the end of the Trinity term, a 7 strong Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Hope, Walker, Hale, Mance, Collins and Clarke) gave its ruling in the Belmont Park case, concerning the applicability of the principle of the common law on insolvency known as the ”anti-deprivation rule”. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
The Fab Five are Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Lady Hale of Richmond, Lord Mance of Frognal and Lord Collins of Mapesbury, of whom one (Lord Walker) has served time on the Patents Court and another (Lord Collins) has presided over a pretty robust bit of patent litigation himself. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
The Supreme Court hearing is to take place on Wednesday 13 and Thursday 14 July 2011 and will be heard by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins of Mapesbury and Lord Clarke. [read post]
