Search for: "Hale v. State Board of Assessment & Review"
Results 21 - 27
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
” In assessing the adequacy of these redaction, the Court of Appeal considered this point from the judgment of Baroness Hale in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] UKSC 4): “In making the proportionality assessment under article 8, the best interests of the child must be a primary consideration. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
First, on Monday 4 and Tuesday 5 April 2011, Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson will hear R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:41 pm
Finally, after establishing who among the population are viable plaintiffs, we would also need to assess the level of disability and future cost of care with a life care plan. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Board of Administration (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 539, 545; Guthrey v. [read post]
