Search for: "Hale v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 4:55 am
Also see R (SG) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 16, at paras 105-106 [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
Gender Inequality in 21st Century Britain: Using litigation as a tool Direct Sex Discrimination and Disadvantage to women: R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40 Introduction: Does Law Have a Gender? [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:04 am
R. and H. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
This principle was famously laid down in the case of Sidhu v British Airways (where passengers could not sue at common law for harm resulting from their plane having been high jacked following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait), and subsequently applied by senior courts around the world, including notably the United States Supreme Court in El Al Israel Airlines v Tseng (though Justice Stevens there dissented). [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 4:11 pm
CSR regularly advertised its asbestos in a trade magazine that was published and circulated in the United States.CSR also acted as the exclusive distributor of Australian sugar to customers in the United States and regularly used the Port of Baltimore to make such distributions. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm
Hale's Com. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:06 am
On Wednesday, CAAF will hear United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 6:17 pm
Al Kassar, 660 F.3d 108, 118 (2d Cir. 2011). [4] United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
United States New York state’s highest court will consider whether U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:16 am
ColbIn Justice Alito's (SA's) leaked opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 5:34 am
That’s as true in Europe as it is in the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm
But since it has no home State in the United States, that means that in that situation, there’s no place for plaintiffs to come together and sue that person, correct? [read post]
FSIA Precludes Suit Against Hungary for Property Confiscated from Its Jewish Population In Holocaust
9 Aug 2023, 4:10 am
In Simon v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 9:14 am
In giving the only judgment Lady Hale stated that no enquiries were made to assess the practicability of moving the family to Bletchley or as to the children’s needs, subject to the Children’s Act 2004, s 11(2). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
