Search for: "Hale v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
I think the comment of Lord Kerr of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Rugby Football Union, … is apposite. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
Hale v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:15 am
See Wilson v United States, 221 US 361 (1911). [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
On the merits of the reconsideration argument, the court said that the NJ holding was at odds with the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in World-Wide Volkswagen and Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Linden J also correctly stated that a religion or belief must meet some modest requirements to be protected under Article 9, citing Williamson and, interestingly, the Strasbourg decision in Eweida v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8 for this proposition (para 136). [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:01 am
Holder, the United States seeks to remove from the United States a lawful permanent resident who has lived here since 1974, because he was convicted of voluntary manslaughter in 1989. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
Hall, 440 U.S. 410 (1979), which permits a sovereign State to be haled into another State’s courts without its consent, should be overruled. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 10:24 am
” Sadly, today we report the decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
The departure from Abdulaziz The Secretary of State relied on Abdulaziz v United Kingdom (1985) 7 EHRR 471 in which the Strasbourg Court held that there was no lack of respect for family life in denying entry to foreign spouses. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
Moreover, in Burke v United Kingdom (App No.19807/0) 11 July 2006, the argument that there was insufficient protection of art 2 rights because a doctor might decide to withdraw CANH without being under an obligation to obtain the approval of the court was expressly rejected. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
The case is Dunn et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
So, to hale them into court, the Art Owners must demonstrate that this case falls within one of the FSIA’s exceptions. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:59 pm
Nicastro - decided by the United States Supreme Court three months after Russell came down. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:26 am
Patmalniece (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 11 – Read judgment / press summary The Supreme Court has ruled that pensioners from other European Union states should not have the right to claim pension credits in the UK. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
In holding that “continuous and systematic contacts” alone are insufficient to establish general jurisdiction, the Supreme Court rejected the idea that a company could be haled into court merely for “doing business” in a state. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:19 am
Lady Hale expresses grave doubts about whether sending the case back to the High Court for further enquiries into the children’s states of mind would be a fruitful exercise [67]. [read post]
