Search for: "Hall v. BNSF Railway Co."
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2014, 8:07 am
However, their claims for benefits under ERISA were dismissed with prejudice because they involved a dispute over the interpretation and application of the terms of a collectively bargained health plan, which was subject to arbitration under the Railway Labor Act (Hall v BNSF Railway Co, September 22, 2014, Martinez, R). [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm
L.J. 225, 228 (C.P Allegheny Co. 1994) (rejecting Hall in toto) (Wettick, J.). [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:31 pm
BNSF Railway Co., employees filed a Title VII claim due to the employer’s failure to cover same-sex spouses under its health plan. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 10:37 am
ManWeb Services, Inc.). 8th Cir.: NLRB determination that union ran exclusive hiring hall stands. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
