Search for: "Hall v. Bingham"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2022, 1:57 am
., September 24, 2022, northbound US91 at milepost 88.9, in Fort Hall, in Bingham County. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
In Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets [2003] 2 AC 430, Lords Bingham and Millett had made pretty scathing comments on the lawfulness of contracting out the review function – Lord Bingham (at [10]) had “very considerable doubts” whether it was a function; and Lord Millett agreeing pointed out that the SI was “concerned in very general terms with deregulation and the subcontracting of ordinary local authority functions”… [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:04 am
45 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 29 from 2012: BJ 1531 W44 2012 What matters? [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 1:05 am
Yet however we look at it, the absence of a single dissent for 47 straight cases – unless we count the disagreement over the reasoning, though not the outcome, in Bull v Hall [2013] UKSC 73 as a case with dissents – is unparalleled in the last 15 years in the UK’s top court. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court is considering the issue in Manchester CC v Pinnock, in which it heard oral argument earlier this year but in which written submissions on the effect of the decision in Kay v UK have been invited, and three other cases, Hounslow LBC v Powell, Leeds CC v Hall and Frisby v Birmingham CC, have been listed in the Supreme Court in late November raising the same or overlapping issue. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm
Domestic law was also consistent with the notion that state authorities have a positive duty to take steps to ensure that lawful public demonstrations can take place, the court referring in particular to the dicta of Lord Bingham in R (Laporte) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Constabulary [2007] 2 AC 105 and the Court of Appeal’s decision in Hall and Others [2011] 1 WLR 504. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The ECHR in McCann v UK (see our notes here and here) preferred Lord Bingham's approach. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The ECHR in McCann v UK (see our notes here and here) preferred Lord Bingham's approach. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
So instead of channeling the ghost of Madison, you wind up channeling Bingham. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 10:43 am
Regard should he had to the comments of Sir Thomas Bingham MR (as he was then) in Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] 3 All ER, to the effect that something cannot be unreasonable if it has a reasonable explanation and behaviour in reliance on the judgment of a legal practitioner is not usually regarded as being unreasonable. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
They each raise the relevance and extent of gateway (b) in two different factual scenarios: (1) termination of a non-secure tenancy/licence occupied by virtue of section 193, Housing Act 1996 (Powell v Hounslow LBC; Manchester CC v Mushin); and (2) tenancies terminated under the introductory tenancy regime contained in Part V, Housing Act 1996 (Hall v Leeds CC; Frisby v Birmingham CC; Mullen v Salford CC). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:47 am
The influence of a “graduated approach to proportionality” had two benefits; it took root in society without being perceived as being imposed from above, and it even influenced Strasbourg case law – see for example the extensive quotations from Lord Bingham’s judgments in Pretty v DPP when the Strasbourg Courts came to consider the case in Pretty v United Kingdom. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 10:46 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
But except for a single justly-famous speech from John Bingham from March 1871, the collection ends before the 1871 Ku Klux debates begin. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:21 am
Wilner served as counsel of record to Guantanamo detainees in Rasul v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
