Search for: "Hall v. PROCESS INSTRUMENTS AND CONTROL"
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Obtaining study protocols, and in some instances, underlying data, are necessary for due process in the gatekeeping process. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
Seats in the Great Hall of Justicewill be allocated on the basis of availability. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
The term does not include birth control devices or oral contraceptives. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
On the other hand, Mr Justice Saini found that the purposes of processing (cf. art. 23(2)(a)), the exemption’s scope (cf. 23(2)(c)) and the specification of controller (cf. 23(2)(e)) were sufficiently detailed and finally that it was not necessary to specify storage periods (cf. 23(2)(g)) as there was no attempt under the exemption to extend such periods beyond what would otherwise be applicable. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am
The lack of EU recognition or an adequacy decision means transfers involving Russian companies can only occur “using one of the other transfer instruments provided for in Chapter V (of the EU General Data Protection Regulation). [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
Judging is a process of narrative transmogrification: courts hear the stories of litigants and transform them into something juridically digestible. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
State v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
For example, writing in August 2017 on the cusp of the coming into force of this instrument, the UK Information Commissione [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
Madison, and the Missouri Crisis are told alongside less familiar ones like Martin v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
The data protection principles were also central to the way in which the much more recent case of GC et. al. v CNIL assessed the processing of past criminal proceedings. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:31 am
The U.N. secretary-general relied—as the depositary of the Rome Statute and according to existing practice (Chapter V)—on determinations made by the U.N. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm
EFF’s annual Pioneer Awards ceremony celebrates individuals and groups who have made outstanding contributions to freedom and innovation on the electronic frontier. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
As to individuation, the Court applied the approach taken in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 8:36 am
County of Los Angeles and Estrada v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 11:02 am
County of Los Angeles and Estrada v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:31 am
We also need to defend the Alice v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
In 2003, in Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
However, such an approach would have potentially been problematic as, unlike in Vidal-Hall v Google [2015] EWCA 311 (where the Court of Appeal disapplied section 13(2) of the DPA), there was no real discrepancy between the EU parent legislation (Directive 95/46/EC/the Data Protection Directive) and the domestic legislation. [read post]
