Search for: "Hall v. Unknown" Results 21 - 40 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2014, 6:43 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Monday, June 9, 2014: Launch of TAG: The LSUC Action Group on Access to Justice‘Intoxicated’ Rob Ford brought unknown woman to empty city hall on Easter Monday: security reports  Toronto gangs forced girls to work as prostitutes, police say in arresting 8Accused rapist head-butts attorney at Seattle court hearing Update: Bill 52,Quebec Assisted Suicide Bill Passes Third ReadingSupreme Court of… [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 8:02 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Jonathan Hafetz is a senior staff attorney in the Center for Democracy at the American Civil Liberties Union and a professor of law at Seton Hall Law School. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:33 am by INFORRM
It was further accepted that, subject to proof, damages were recoverable by those four claimants for distress both at common law and, following Vidal-Hall v Google Inc, under section 13 of the 1998. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
Following the arrest of three journalists covering Just Stop Oil protests last week, Hertfordshire Police Chief, Constable Charlie Hall, introduced new measures to protect legitimate media reporting and commissioned an independent review of the arrests. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 7:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
We explored these challenges on Friday at the 19th Annual Constitutional Cases Conference at Osgoode Hall. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Damages Dan Tench explained how the remedies available to individuals asserting data protection rights have been widened by the landmark ruling in Google v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311, as s 13(2) of the DPA has now been disapplied and individuals are entitled to recover damages under the Act for non-material loss. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 24 April 2023, Linden J granted an injunction following the hack of the claimant’s IT system in the case of Armstrong Watson LLP v Persons Unknown [2023] EWHC 921 (KB). [read post]