Search for: "Hall v. Weare" Results 121 - 140 of 196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2012, 3:05 am by New Books Script
Toronto, Ont. : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:12 pm by Zach Feinberg
Unless they truly have science on their side, probably not—the case is being likened to Packer v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:23 pm by Team
The prime minister Fillon requested public employees to forbid entrance to all public facilities (train stations, metro stations, airports, courts, prisons, police stations, museums, schools, universities, hospitals, stadiums, libraries, town-halls, polling stations, driving license offices, immigration and asylum offices…) and to refuse service to citizens on the ground that their face is covered (note PRMC1106214C) even though the citizen is offering to show his face for… [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:23 pm by Team
The prime minister Fillon requested public employees to forbid entrance to all public facilities (train stations, metro stations, airports, courts, prisons, police stations, museums, schools, universities, hospitals, stadiums, libraries, town-halls, polling stations, driving license offices, immigration and asylum offices…) and to refuse service to citizens on the ground that their face is covered (note PRMC1106214C) even though the citizen is offering to show his face for… [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Bull & Bull v Hall & Preddy [2012] EWCA Civ 83 – Read judgment On 10th February 2012, the Court of Appeal upheld a Judge’s ruling that a Christian couple, Peter and Hazelmary Bull, had discriminated against Martin Hall and Steven Preddy on grounds of sexual orientation when they refused them a double-bedded room at their hotel near Penzance. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:39 pm by Kashmir Hill
Last year, two Washington lawyers actually let me set them up on a V-Day date. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:49 am by SHG
From the 9th Circuit decision in Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 1:06 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
  The Supreme Court has held (in Clark v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit (Hall, Miner and Sack) says, "Bank alleges that the defendants violated his constitutional rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments by orally directing him not to wear a baseball hat when appearing in court and by admonishing him for wearing inappropriately casual attire. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:10 am
Peter street to Preservation Hall. [read post]