Search for: "Halls v. Office of the United States Trustee"
Results 21 - 32
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term
Commencing March 4, 1877
1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:31 am
This approach was on display during the dense and complex arguments in Samantar v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:56 am
Deborah Turner, LW’07, served as the 20th president of the League of Women Voters of the United States and chair of the Board of Trustees of the League of Women Voters Education Fund. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Hall and Moses S. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
Julien v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
Board of Trustees of the Village of Grand ViewCourt: U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-485 October 19, 2011 Judge: Hall Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Real Estate & Property Law, Zoning, Planning & Land Use Plaintiff brought this action against the Village Defendants alleging a violation of his constitutional rights as a result of the Zoning Board of Appeals' denial of his application for a certificate… [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:56 am
At issue in the case of FCC v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Rasmussen, "The Story of Case v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
