Search for: "Halpern v. Halpern"
Results 61 - 75
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2009, 2:27 am
Subscription
NEW YORK COUNTYContracts
Contract Breach Claim by Unlicensed Managers Dismissed; Unjust Enrichment Claim Remains
Halpern v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 5:31 am
Yet in 1847 Justice McLean held, in Story v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:31 am
John Charles Vuckovich v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 10:00 am
Michael Bishop v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 7:28 pm
I have been supplied with a copy of a 2007 New York Supreme Court Queens County Opinion in Garcia, Sebastian (inf) et ano v New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation (Index 26721/2000)- along with a series of other Orders which a number of settlement planners and structured settlement brokers apparently "thrust out" en masse at the American Association for Justice (AAJ) meeting in Philadelphia to disparage Richard Halpern. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:12 pm
Do they…under Part V of the SLRA, define what a spouse is? [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:49 pm
Section 512(d) deals with information tools. 17 U.S.C.A § 512(d) (1998).2 Jakob Halpern, Finding a Safe Harbor, 189 N.J.L.J. 1082, 1083 (2007).3 Id.4 Jakob Halpern, supra note 2, at 1084.5 Id.6 See Field v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:11 am
Index 106747/04
2007 NY Slip Op 06807Curtis Partitions Corp. v Halpern Constr., Inc. [read post]
14 May 2007, 3:15 am
Counter-restitution not required Halpern and Another v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 2:30 pm
Halpern cashed the check and then (allegedly) promptly did nothing -- no petition, no filing, no return telephone calls, nothing. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 12:46 pm
Wentworth SSC Ltd v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 12:02 am
Halpern, Craig Allen Nard and Kenneth L. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 6:47 am
My response invoked Cincinnati v. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 8:20 am
Sheldon Halpern: The Michelob court said that 20% of the respondents were confused and thought that Michelob was selling Michelob Oily - we are so much more comfortable talking about likely confusion. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 4:41 pm
Halpern trusts judges more to prevent egregious results, especially since Congress isn't about to repeal §43(c).Bone: Initial interest confusion was created by judges, not Congress. [read post]
