Search for: "Hamblen v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am
Decision Lord Hamblen delivered the only judgment, with which all the other Lord Justices agreed. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On 17 and 18 October 2023, the UK Supreme Court (Lords Hodge, Hamblen, Leggatt, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of George v Cannell. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:26 am
Lord Hamblen neatly summaries this position at [57] stating: “In summary, the certification provision should be interpreted as being conclusive as to the service charge “sum payable by the tenant” but not as to the underlying liability for the service charge. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
These cases demonstrate clearly the change of position as compared with Allianz v West Tankers and Turner v Grovit, respectively. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 3:13 am
Lord Hamblen gave the lead judgment with which the majority agree. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:24 am
The correct approach is to follow the guidance which was stated to be “authoritative” in KO (Nigeria), namely the direction in the Upper Tribunal case of MK (Sierra Leone) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] INLR 563 (“MK”). [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:34 am
Lord Hamblen and Lady Rose dissent. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
So I think on this I would adopt the words of Chief Justice Holt, in the great case of Coggs v Barnard in 1703, when he said: “I have stirred these points, which wiser heads in time may settle. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am
The engagement letter issued by BDO and signed by Mr Tinkler required Mr Tinkler to sign a Form 64-8, stating as follows: “the Inland Revenue will treat this as authority to correspond with us [ie BDO], in which case they will not correspond with you except to the extent formally required to do so. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:29 am
” Before the Court of Appeal, the Test Claimants argued that, where a claimant is seeking to recover money paid under a mistake of law, the effect of section 32(1)(c) is to postpone the commencement of the limitation period until such time as the true state of the law is established by a judicial decision from which there lies no right of appeal. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:14 am
The appeal was heard on 8 February 2021 before Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
AIALA, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:46 am
Lord Briggs and Lord Hamblen gave the judgment, with which the other members of the Court agreed. [read post]
Case Preview: Protect Rural England (Kent) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
27 Jan 2021, 2:30 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department[4]. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Reed and Lord Hodge gave the main judgment, with which Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Hamblen agreed. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
The majority of three (Lords Kerr, Hamblen and Leggatt) favoured the location of the seat as determinative in this case. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Carnwath, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Briggs, Lord Sales, and Lord Hamblen. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282). [read post]
