Search for: "Hamdi v. Rumsfeld"
Results 61 - 80
of 222
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2017, 1:30 pm
Quoting Al-Bihani v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
He also argues, in the alternative, that the length of his detention cannot be reconciled with traditional law of war principles, as read into the AUMF by the Supreme Court in Hamdi v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:57 am
Rumsfeld. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 2:00 pm
In its landmark 2004 decision in Hamdi v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:10 pm
If, as the Supreme Court held in 2004’s Hamdi v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm
Rumsfeld, and broader provisions of international law—all of which would deny the commission’s jurisdiction, he argued. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm
Ct. 1958 (2013): From Hamdi v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 5:19 am
Rumsfeld --Notes and Questions --A Note on Hamdi --Mathews v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:28 am
But especially after Hamdi v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 2:41 pm
Rumsfeld) or by constitutional interpretation (see his dissent in Boumediene v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:37 pm
Over the last few weeks, Congress and the White House have been circling one another, angling for that final bit of leverage that will define whether President Obama does or does not get to fulfill his first-week-in-office pledge to shutter the Guantanamo Bay detention facility. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 6:25 am
Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006); Hamdi v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:29 am
Rumsfeld, and Boumediene v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:13 am
Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006); Hamdi v. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 12:01 am
” In Hamdi v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 12:30 pm
First, and doctrinally, there’s the “immediate custodian” rule articulated by the Supreme Court in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 5:19 pm
We have held several American citizens for a multiple period of years as enemy combatants … Before I vote on your nomination, I want you to read Hamdi v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
As Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in the lead opinion rejecting the Bush Administration’s claim for unreviewable detention authority in Hamdi v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:13 am
Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952); el que se le debe otorgar el debido proceso de ley a los ciudadanos americanos detenidos en la guerra contra el terrorismo en Hamdi v. [read post]
