Search for: "Hamilton v. Wells"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2021, 8:12 am
Hamilton International Ltd., a well-known pocket watch parts manufacturer, failed to prove the likelihood of consumer confusion in its suit alleging that Vortic LLC infringed its trademark by selling a wristwatch that contained refurbished antique pocket watch parts that retained Hamilton’s original trademark, the U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 5:52 pm
In Hamilton et al. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:20 am
The K.T. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:17 am
These commentators look to Myers v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm
Kline School of Law, where she specializes in legal research and writing as well as the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 6:16 pm
Pfaff v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 7:49 am
An excellent example of this phenomenon is the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Halo v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:45 am
With regard to Hamilton Uptown, LLC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 8:50 am
The Hamilton court fairly well ignored this evidence, which should have been dispositive. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 9:28 am
Hamilton v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
When you read the complete text of Hamilton v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 8:12 am
Hamilton International Ltd., a well-known pocket watch parts manufacturer, failed to prove the likelihood of consumer confusion in its suit alleging that Vortic LLC infringed its trademark by selling a wristwatch that contained refurbished antique pocket watch parts that retained Hamilton’s original trademark, the U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 4:46 am
This is true, but the school system adopted a computer policy well prior to the 2009 investigation of, and 2011 charges against, Hamilton. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 11:49 am
In Garrison v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 11:09 am
Indeed, in Myers v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
The case was Dearborn v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 1:14 pm
So let’s talk about Hamilton v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:07 pm
The case Hamilton v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
" This category would also include inferior officers, who are not Senate confirmed, as well as appointed positions in Congress, such as the Clerk of the House and the Secretary of the Senate. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
(Hamilton). [read post]
