Search for: "Hamlet v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2021, 12:39 am by Neil Wilkof
Having lost at first instance, Birkenstock stated on appeal (before the Court of Appeal of the Hague) that the result in the Birkenstock v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 9:07 am by Giles Peaker
Tower Hamlets LBC v Ali, County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch. 21 July 2021 Tower Hamlets (“TH”) brought a claim for possession against Mr Ali after his mother, a secure tenant, died. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 7:56 am by Ion Meyn
At the heart of the rule-resistant narrative is Graham v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 7:03 am by SW
In the case of Begum v Tower Hamlets (2005) 1 WLR 2103, Neuberger LJ (as he then was) said that an authority could only reject a second or subsequent application which was based on exactly the same facts as the previous application. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 11:25 am by JR Chaves
Dilema de Hamlet: Aplaudir al personal sanitario o pagarles, that is the question» VIII. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 2:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
To turn to speech hostile to a group I belong to (Jews), when I talked about a rare recent group libel case, the Montana State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:40 am by Eugene Volokh
To turn to speech hostile to a group I belong to (Jews), when I talked about a rare recent group libel case, the Montana State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 2:44 pm by Giles Peaker
Al Ahmed v London Borough of Tower Hamlets (2020) EWCA Civ 51 We saw the High Court in this case take an incredibly strict approach to homelessness section 204 appeal timescales (our report), deciding that seeking legal aid representation could not be a good reason for filing an appeal out of time because, well, the substance of any appeal should be obvious to an unrepresented homeless applicant. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 2:44 pm by Giles Peaker
Al Ahmed v London Borough of Tower Hamlets (2020) EWCA Civ 51 We saw the High Court in this case take an incredibly strict approach to homelessness section 204 appeal timescales (our report), deciding that seeking legal aid representation could not be a good reason for filing an appeal out of time because, well, the substance of any appeal should be obvious to an unrepresented homeless applicant. [read post]